| Summary |
Diversity is increasingly at the core of the academic and political debate. On the one hand, diversity is referred to as a main asset for development and human welfare. At the global level, the Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO, 2001) states that 'cultural diversity is as necessary for humankind as biodiversity is for nature' (Art. 1). Similarly, at the European level, diversity is seen as the core concept of European identity (and 'United in Diversity' is the motto proposed by the European Constitution). On the other hand, the processes of European integration, enlargement, new migration flows and the compression of time and space induced by globalisation bring diversity to the forefront, facing policy-makers with formidable questions, concerning as different areas as migration, labour market, education and language policies as well as the physical, political and social structure of cities. These processes raise a series of questions to policy-makers, which touch upon different areas of policy-making, ranging from labour market, education, migration policies to issues related to urban areas, governance and political responsibility, citizenship.
Building on six inter-disciplinary workshops, we propose a policy framework for dealing with diversity. In the new framework, a priori rules are replaced by issue-specific negotiation processes, whose decisions are valid only over a definite time span. The negotiation processes are characterised by three conditions. Firstly, negotiation does not start with the assumption of commonality nor strives towards commonality. Rather, compatibility of actions should be searched. The act of defining common values and motives implies the danger of establishing the superiority of one form of life and the inferiority of another. The principle is to promote dialogue between individuals and groups with different identities without asking these actors to develop a shared system of basic values or common worldview. Secondly, the relationships among different individuals and groups take place in an open/heterogeneous setting, rather than in a closed/homogenous setting. Flexible system boundaries allow connections and relationships outside the core. Finally, in searching for compatibility of the actions, parties of the negotiation process need to avoid a discourse of cultural rights and fixed identities. Rather, they need to strive for non-ethnicisation, e.g. to avoid attributing the reasons of particular behaviours and practices to the cultural backgrounds of the other. Although the analytical focus was on the cities, such a framework derives from broader considerations and is therefore more generally applicable. |